Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › NanoMOS › Reviews
This resource has a 8.2 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 12 Jul 2014
Users: 2377
Jobs: 40064
Avg. exec. time: 10 mins
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 9.9 out of 5 stars
Citations: 99
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Advanced-Expert
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

2377 users, detailed usage

210 users in 39 classes

99 Citation(s)

24 questions (Ask a question)

1 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

NanoMOS

By Zhibin Ren1, Sebastien Goasguen1, Akira Matsudaira2, Shaikh S. Ahmed3, Kurtis Cantley4, Yang Liu5, Yunfei Gao1, Xufeng Wang1, Mark Lundstrom1

1. Purdue University 2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 3. Southern Illinois University Carbondale 4. University of Texas at Dallas 5. IBM

2-D simulator for thin body (less than 5 nm), fully depleted, double-gated n-MOSFETs

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 4.0.3 - published on 26 Jun 2014

doi:10.4231/D3GQ6R32D cite this

Open source: license | download

View All Supporting Documents

Reviews

Write a review

  1. 0 Like 0 Dislike

    Oka Kurniawan

    2.0 out of 5 stars

    I couldn’t run the ballistic NEGF. It gives me error

    error no element found at line 18210

    Hope this bug is fixed so that I can try it.

    Edit Reply Report abuse

    Please login to vote.

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.