Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › nanoMATERIALS nanoscale heat transport › Usage
This resource has a 0.6 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 07 Mar 2014
Users: 156
Jobs: 1285
Avg. exec. time: 3 hours
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 1

3 users, detailed usage

46 users in 3 classes

1 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

2 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

nanoMATERIALS nanoscale heat transport

Non-equilibrium MD simulations of heat transport in nano-materials

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0 - published on 31 Aug 2011

doi:10.4231/D34Q7QQ1V cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "nanoMATERIALS nanoscale heat transport" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

156

11 13 32 38 40 43 47 48 49 53 58 60 65 71 71 73 73 76 78 78 78 142 146 147 148 152 152 153 154 156 156

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 124 (79.49%)
Unidentified 20 (12.82%)
Industry 8 (5.13%)
Educational - Pre-College 2 (1.28%)
Government Agency 1 (0.64%)
National Lab 1 (0.64%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 79 (70.54%)
in INDIA 7 (6.25%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 7 (6.25%)
cn CHINA 4 (3.57%)
co COLOMBIA 4 (3.57%)
es SPAIN 3 (2.68%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 2 (1.79%)
my MALAYSIA 2 (1.79%)
be BELGIUM 2 (1.79%)
ca CANADA 2 (1.79%)

Simulation Runs

1,285

138 145 542 698 701 704 711 717 723 730 745 775 813 920 921 928 930 937 942 946 946 1244 1252 1254 1259 1275 1276 1278 1279 1285 1285
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 10.32 hours 277.84 days
CPU time 2.95 hours 79.53 days
Interaction Time 3.34 hours 89.79 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.