DATE CHANGE: nanoHUB could be intermittently unavailable on 05/06 from 8:00 am – 1:00 pm (EST) for scheduled maintenance. All tool sessions will expire on 05/06 at 8:00 am (EST).
Find information on common issues.
Ask questions and find answers from other users.
Suggest a new site feature or improvement.
Check on status of your tickets.
I am trying to simulate ‘silicon’ crystal using ‘create your own crystal’ option. But I am getting an error that says ‘
Closed | Responses: 0
Tried to simulate Bucky ball and CNT, it gives an import error for both
Closed | Responses: 2
How can I determine position of the atoms in the unit cell for a zincblende 110/111 crystal
distorted Miller plane views?
Open | Responses: 1
First of all, congratulations for the tool. I’m trying to have my students using it for visualizing crystal surfaces, and wanted to compare the fcc-(100) and bcc-(100). They should both...
I can’t see any images.
The program seems like it runs when I click simulate, but where I’m supposed to be seeing the image all I get is grey. I have access to all of the options on the right hand side.
Can you customize the basis?
Is there a way to create and visualize a crystal that isn’t already pre-packaged, i.e. use an existing lattice with a custom basis? I want to visualize the crystal structure shown...
how do i see the plane?
Closed | Responses: 1
hii, how can I view the distance between the nearest-neighbour atoms in a bcc lattice?
how do we see other crystal orientations for instance for silicon, (557),?
open surface problem
Open | Responses: 2
I would like to see a Hexagonal closed packed crystal but where is that? Do you have it?
Thank you for the tool.
In addition to the unit cells, can you also show larger chunks of the crystal
Open | Responses: 3
The tool could be dramatically improved if not only the unit cells were shown, but also multiple unit cells to form a larger chunk of the crystal.
It would also be great to be able to see...
Bravais lattice viewer shows very small atoms and very long bonds.
The tool could benefit in its visibility if the bonds were made smaller just like the fix that has happened with the graphene lattice, that is now showing properly.
Orthorhombic and Tetragonal unit cells are not properly displayed.
Orthorhombic and Tetragonal unit cells are not properly displayed. They both seem to appear just like cubic cells.
Si and GaAs structure appear to be on different scales or different origins.
It is hard to compare the two materials as the origin is shifted out of the field of view. Can get this get fixed?
graphene unit cell representation shows very small atoms
when the graphene material system is displayed as a unit cell the carbon atoms are really small. In the diamond lattice or the bucky ball that is not the case. Can this get so the atoms are...