Tags: tool:nanofet

All Categories (1-5 of 5)

  1. Tool is insensitive to band gap change

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 3

    It seems that nanofet is insensitive to band-gap changes. No matter the value of the band-gap entered, the resulting IV curve is the same. I have even increased the band-gap dramatically, and...


  2. Server disconnected (code: 1006) when simulating

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 0

    Any time I try to run any kind of simulation at all, the process crashes and returns Server Disconnected (code: 1006).

    Is there something I can do (or not do) to correct this and allow...


  3. supports any material other then Si?

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 0

    Can I use any other material but Si? And I assume for silicon, only single conduction band valley is considered. In that case, if I use nanoFET for, suppose, GaSb- where L valley electrons...


  4. why there is difference in results between this tool and Nonamos at Tsi=3nm

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    I have done run on this tool and on Nanomos with certain configuration,but there is difference between results. As example the current ID=3.0932uA/um in this tool and ID=4.4292*e3uA/um in https://nanohub.org/answers/question/213

  5. Shaikh S. Ahmed

    Shaikh Shahid Ahmed is currently working as a Full Professor with the School of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA. Dr. Ahmed has...