Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Illinois Tools: Bio Photonics Simulator › Usage
This resource has a 0.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 01 Aug 2014
Users: 90
Jobs: 377
Avg. exec. time: 27 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0

90 users, detailed usage

0 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Illinois Tools: Bio Photonics Simulator

By Zuhaib Bashir Sheikh1, Nahil Sobh1

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Simulate passage of light through biological tissue using FDTD

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.1 - published on 22 May 2012

doi:10.4231/D31C1TF3T cite this

Open source: license | download

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Illinois Tools: Bio Photonics Simulator" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

90

9 14 16 40 44 49 49 50 50 50 52 53 56 59 60 62 64 66 66 68 70 71 75 77 78 79 85 88 90 90

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 62 (68.89%)
Unidentified 23 (25.56%)
Educational - Pre-College 2 (2.22%)
National Lab 1 (1.11%)
Unemployed 1 (1.11%)
Industry 1 (1.11%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 29 (55.77%)
in INDIA 10 (19.23%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 4 (7.69%)
br BRAZIL 2 (3.85%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2 (3.85%)
ca CANADA 1 (1.92%)
za SOUTH AFRICA 1 (1.92%)
my MALAYSIA 1 (1.92%)
co COLOMBIA 1 (1.92%)
at AUSTRIA 1 (1.92%)

Simulation Runs

377

31 40 44 257 270 280 280 281 281 283 286 288 292 299 303 306 312 316 316 319 324 328 333 336 340 343 362 374 377 377
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 7.08 hours 60.75 days
CPU time 27.47 seconds 1.57 hours
Interaction Time 1.42 hours 12.17 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.