Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 11
Total Simulation Users Served: 1,246
Total "and more" Users Served: 2,620
Rank by Contributions: 90 / 1421
First Contribution: 09 May 2005
Last Contribution: 02 May 2011
Citations on Contributions: 2
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 76 users served in 12 courses from 8 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Carbon nanotube based fixed-fixed NEMS 66 317 524 2,360 - 14 Mar 2008
2 Carbon nanotube based NEMS with cantilever structure 81 335 511 2,853 2 14 Mar 2008
3 SEST 5 9 147 387 - 17 Jun 2006
4 CGTB 22 76 297 793 - 17 Jun 2006
5 CENEMS 13 47 620 1,757 - 20 Apr 2006
TOTAL 158 784 1,246 8,150
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Illinois CNST Annual Nanotechnology Workshop 2010 Lecture 12: Multiscale Analysis of Silicon NEMS Online Presentations 3 26 - 02 May 2011
2 Illinois 2007 Nano-Bio Workshop with nanoHUB Summer School and User Forum Workshops 62 543 - 27 Apr 2007
3 Introduction to the CENEMS Simulation Tool Learning Modules 16 342 - 10 Apr 2006
4 Hierarchical Physical Models for Analysis of Electrostatic Nanoelectromechanical Systems (NEMS) Online Presentations 38 959 - 05 Jan 2006
5 Computational Methods for NEMS Online Presentations 67 964 - 20 Aug 2005
6 Computational Nanofluidics Presentation Materials 0 0 - 09 May 2005
TOTAL 188 2,620
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.