Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 14
Total Simulation Users Served: 11,828
Total "and more" Users Served: 1,644
Rank by Contributions: 82 / 1499
First Contribution: 09 Feb 2006
Last Contribution: 23 Feb 2011
Citations on Contributions: 277
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 4,113 users served in 306 courses from 38 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 FETToy 358 6,638 3,346 60,487 57 23 Feb 2011
2 QuaMC2D 29 530 504 8,573 2 24 Feb 2007
3 CNTFET Lab 203 18,092 1,638 174,459 9 09 Feb 2007
4 NanoFET 101 6,695 1,036 50,544 7 09 Feb 2007
5 NanoMOS 192 3,082 2,444 41,807 100 19 May 2006
6 MOSCap 729 6,096 4,864 47,225 2 06 Apr 2006
7 MOSFet 654 10,388 5,117 75,746 6 30 Mar 2006
8 Schred 253 4,697 2,693 86,886 120 09 Feb 2006
TOTAL 1,823 56,218 11,828 545,727
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Why QuaMC 2D and Particle-Based Device Simulators? Online Presentations 30 183 - 13 May 2008
2 Examples for QuaMC 2D particle-based device Simulator Tool Online Presentations 14 194 - 12 May 2008
3 Modeling Coulomb Effects in Nanoscale Devices Online Presentations 13 119 - 28 Apr 2008
4 Particle-Based Device Simulators Description Online Presentations 87 350 1 28 Apr 2008
5 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D—Part II: Applications Papers 107 595 1 14 Jan 2008
6 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D: Part I − Models and Benchmarks Papers 70 524 - 14 Jan 2008
TOTAL 297 1,644
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.