Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 14
Total Simulation Users Served: 11,130
Rank by Contributions: 78 / 1451
First Contribution: 09 Feb 2006
Last Contribution: 23 Feb 2011
Citations on Contributions: 276
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 3,893 users served in 293 courses from 38 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 FETToy 345 7,416 3,246 58,764 57 23 Feb 2011
2 QuaMC2D 37 948 500 8,549 2 24 Feb 2007
3 CNTFET Lab 195 42,964 1,561 171,018 8 09 Feb 2007
4 NanoFET 88 7,479 1,002 49,967 7 09 Feb 2007
5 NanoMOS 221 2,885 2,394 40,495 100 19 May 2006
6 MOSCap 775 7,461 4,559 44,800 2 06 Apr 2006
7 MOSFet 679 9,332 4,832 71,445 6 30 Mar 2006
8 Schred 226 4,951 2,590 84,774 120 09 Feb 2006
TOTAL 1,891 83,436 11,130 529,812
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Why QuaMC 2D and Particle-Based Device Simulators? Online Presentations 22 164 - 13 May 2008
2 Examples for QuaMC 2D particle-based device Simulator Tool Online Presentations 21 185 - 12 May 2008
3 Modeling Coulomb Effects in Nanoscale Devices Online Presentations 8 114 - 28 Apr 2008
4 Particle-Based Device Simulators Description Online Presentations 66 290 1 28 Apr 2008
5 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D—Part II: Applications Publications 90 519 1 14 Jan 2008
6 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D: Part I − Models and Benchmarks Publications 85 482 - 14 Jan 2008
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.