All Purdue clusters (Coates, Rossmann, Hansen, Carter, and Conte) are scheduled for downtime on March 15 and 16, 2014. Tools that use these clusters will not execute simulations. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Energies and Lifetimes with Complex-Scaling › Usage
This resource has a 0.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 13 Mar 2014
Users: 22
Jobs: 99
Avg. exec. time: 3 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0

22 users, detailed usage

0 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Energies and Lifetimes with Complex-Scaling

By Daniel Lee Whitenack1, Adam Wasserman1

1. Purdue University

Calculate the resonance energies and lifetimes of a user-defined potential with a uniform complex-scaling transformation.

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0 - published on 25 Oct 2012

doi:10.4231/D34T6F282 cite this

Open source: license | download

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Energies and Lifetimes with Complex-Scaling" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

22

6 7 8 10 13 14 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 19 19 21 22 22

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 12 (54.55%)
Unidentified 9 (40.91%)
Educational - Pre-College 1 (4.55%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 6 (46.15%)
in INDIA 2 (15.38%)
de GERMANY 1 (7.69%)
pl POLAND 1 (7.69%)
cn CHINA 1 (7.69%)
es SPAIN 1 (7.69%)
iq IRAQ 1 (7.69%)

Simulation Runs

99

61 62 64 71 79 80 84 84 87 87 87 87 87 89 89 98 99 99
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.43 hours 2.33 days
CPU time 3.04 seconds 1.98 minutes
Interaction Time 6.77 minutes 4.4 hours

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.