Tags: tool:bandstrlab

All Categories (1-20 of 75)

  1. 111 nanowire in electronis and holes

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 2

    Simulation seems to stall at the end of the NEMO5 simulation for 2.5nm thick 111 wires.   When selectin electrons and holes combined.   The individual "just...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/2167

  2. 2% biaxial strain Ge, promen at the Gamma point

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 0

    Dear all, When I simulate the bandstructure of Ge with high strain (2%), I get a discontinuity at the Gamma point, and therefore the effective masses are not correctly calculated. Can you...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/1080

  3. 8,10 nm thickness UTB with default values gives error

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    When I tried to simulate UTB and double gate devices with 10 nm silicon thickness by using default values gives error…

    Thank you

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/485

  4. Abnormal Termination of DGMOS UTB Self-Consistent Simulation

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 0

    When running an Ultra-thin body MOSFET simulation with the job type set to “Calculate the UTB band-structure self consistently https://nanohub.org/answers/question/1100

  5. Abort

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 2

    To terminate a simulation, the abort button is not working.

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/414

  6. Any cahnce you can include the DOS from the E(k) curves for a 1D Kronig Penny model?

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 1

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/318

  7. atomic coordinates file should have the right file extension *.pdb so one can read it into a local visualizer right away

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 2

    The ability to ownload a coorinate file is existing now. However the file comes back as a t *.txt file. It if ame back with the right extension, my local machine could immediately use the...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/248

  8. Band structure error in InAs UTB devices

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 0

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    first of all, I would like to thank you to have developed and made ​​available online this tool. Currently, I’m interested in the study of the band structure of https://nanohub.org/answers/question/1328

  9. biaxial strain in bulk produces no results

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 3

    Starting from scratch with a new simulation I am just turning on bi-axial strain in the bulk simulation mode and I get not simulation results.

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/220

  10. bulk bandstructure: k-axis scale

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 2

    It seems that the bulk bandstructure shows E-k along L->Gamma->X->UK->Gamma. If so, the k-scale does not seem to be correct. The distance between Gamma and X appear to be correct...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/553

  11. Bulk Si eff. mass vs. biaxial Strain

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 2

    Hello there,

    I was simulating Strain sweep on Bulk Si. I applied biaxial strain from -0.015 to 0.015 in https://nanohub.org/answers/question/832

  12. Can not see any results in the drop down menu.

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 0

    Hello,

    When I simulate the tool e.g. UTB default simulation, after completion of the simulation I can not find any outputs .In the results drop down menu input deck, backend code log,...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/733

  13. Can we increase the limit of k-space region from 0,0 to

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    I want to simulate the Ultra-thin body Silicon for [0,0] to [1,0]  instead of [0,0] to [0.5,0] in k-space.I am unable to change that manually.Please can you help me out?

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/1708

  14. can we simulate the band structure of graphene?

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/967

  15. code crashes when 8nm triangular cross section nanowires are entered

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 3

    code crashes when 8nm triangular cross section nanowires are entered crashes both in the electronic structure calculation as well as charge-selfconsistent calculation. Error message in the...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/277

  16. Confinement Effective mass

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    Dear Admins, I am interested in calculating the effective mass along the confinement direction for nanowire geometries. Can this be done using Bandstrlab or is there another tool for it? Thanks...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/1110

  17. Could k be expressed by kx ky kz?

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 2

    I do not really know the meaning of “effective k” in the result figure.(the square root of kx ky kz?) This tool can show a table of k-E. Is this possible to show the “kx ky kz...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/191

  18. differences between sp3s* and sp3d5s* models

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    In this version of bandstrlab, the sp3s* model is not implemented (there is only one model, i.e. the sp3d5s*). It would be interesting to have that model to compare the differences between the...

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/838

  19. Does a positive value of epsilon correspond to tensile strain?

    Q&A|Open | Responses: 1

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/694

  20. Does simulation assume 300K?

    Q&A|Closed | Responses: 1

    Is it possible to calculate band structure at different temp?

    https://nanohub.org/answers/question/894